Close Menu
  • News
  • Stocks
  • Bonds
  • Commodities
  • Collectables
    • Art
    • Classic Cars
    • Whiskey
    • Wine
  • Trading
  • Alternative Investment
  • Markets
  • More
    • Economy
    • Money
    • Business
    • Personal Finance
    • Investing
    • Financial Planning
    • ETFs
    • Equities
    • Funds

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest markets and assets news and updates directly to your inbox.

Trending Now

Beyond Meat is on a wild ride. Why you should think twice before taking a bite.

October 25, 2025

Tesla just shared more about its AI vision. These are the 3 biggest takeaways.

October 25, 2025

The Louvre Heist Shines Light on Forgotten French Crown Jewels—and Their Political History

October 25, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
The Asset ObserverThe Asset Observer
Newsletter
LIVE MARKET DATA
  • News
  • Stocks
  • Bonds
  • Commodities
  • Collectables
    • Art
    • Classic Cars
    • Whiskey
    • Wine
  • Trading
  • Alternative Investment
  • Markets
  • More
    • Economy
    • Money
    • Business
    • Personal Finance
    • Investing
    • Financial Planning
    • ETFs
    • Equities
    • Funds
The Asset ObserverThe Asset Observer
Home»Economy
Economy

One Way to Defend Populism

News RoomBy News RoomNovember 27, 2024
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

There is a way and, I suggest, only one way to defend populism from a liberal viewpoint: it is to reject the populist concept of “the people.”

Let the people be plural, that is, a collection of individuals. Let each individual be recognized as having a right to veto (at some contractual-constitutional level) any prohibition or mandate he (or she, of course) does not consent to. A fortiori, no subset of the people may use coercion against the individuals in another subset. It follows that the elite or the experts (“they”) or the politicians themselves may not legitimately boss people around. If populism is thus characterized, it is defendable from both a moral and an economic viewpoint as it would coincide with (classical) liberalism. Liberalism is about a negative veto right of each individual–at least as formalized by James Buchanan and Anthony de Jasay, but the paradigm runs deeper. Liberalism certainly and emphatically does not support an unrestricted positive right of some individuals, even a majority of them, to impose bans or mandates on individuals in the plural people.

That is not how populism, in the standard meaning of the word, is defined and sold to the masses, that is, to a majority or a plurality of them. Populism requires the existence of “the people” singular (see, for example, Cass Mudde and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Populism: A Very Short Introduction [Oxford University Press, 2017] for the academically accepted definition, which is close to the one I assign to the populists). If “the people” (singular) does not exist as such, then populism is not possible; it is just a label that hides an interventionist, collectivist, and authoritarian ideology. (See my “The Impossibility of Populism,” The Independent Review, Summer 2021.)

To be both internally consistent and compatible with liberalism, populism would have to take “the people” in the plural and liberal sense of “individuals,” with none more deserving of power over his fellows. It would not be “populism” anymore.

******************************

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Keep Reading

Links 10/15/2025 | naked capitalism

Starmer’s Complete Destruction Of What Was Once Great Britain

Prevalent Poverty Amid Robust Consumer Spending

Orban Accuses Zelensky Of Moral Blackmail

Disparity between high- and low-income earners’ views of economy is shocking

AI: Is it Really Different this Time?

The Magic of Tokyo (with Joe McReynolds)

An Intuition Test – Econlib

Constitutional Reform in Jamaica: Sentiment or Substance?

Recent Posts
  • Beyond Meat is on a wild ride. Why you should think twice before taking a bite.
  • Tesla just shared more about its AI vision. These are the 3 biggest takeaways.
  • The Louvre Heist Shines Light on Forgotten French Crown Jewels—and Their Political History
  • Artist Sues Chris Levine Over Credit for Iconic Queen Portraits
  • Crypto Market Update: FalconX to Buy 21Shares, Senate Democrats Call Out Trump Envoy

Subscribe to Newsletter

Get the latest markets and assets news and updates directly to your inbox.

Editors Picks

Tesla just shared more about its AI vision. These are the 3 biggest takeaways.

October 25, 2025

The Louvre Heist Shines Light on Forgotten French Crown Jewels—and Their Political History

October 25, 2025

Artist Sues Chris Levine Over Credit for Iconic Queen Portraits

October 25, 2025

Crypto Market Update: FalconX to Buy 21Shares, Senate Democrats Call Out Trump Envoy

October 25, 2025

Kraftwerk Cofounder’s Vintage Electronic Gear and Ephemera Go Up for Auction

October 25, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
© 2025 The Asset Observer. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.