Close Menu
  • News
  • Stocks
  • Bonds
  • Commodities
  • Collectables
    • Art
    • Classic Cars
    • Whiskey
    • Wine
  • Trading
  • Alternative Investment
  • Markets
  • More
    • Economy
    • Money
    • Business
    • Personal Finance
    • Investing
    • Financial Planning
    • ETFs
    • Equities
    • Funds

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest markets and assets news and updates directly to your inbox.

Trending Now

Contemporary Istanbul fair director urges Turkish art to remain ‘radical and clever’ in face of political tension – The Art Newspaper

September 27, 2025

‘There’s no fudging. She deserves to win’: critics react as Turner Prize 2025 opens – The Art Newspaper

September 27, 2025

Thaddaeus Ropac is betting on Milan—will it pay off? – The Art Newspaper

September 27, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
The Asset ObserverThe Asset Observer
Newsletter
LIVE MARKET DATA
  • News
  • Stocks
  • Bonds
  • Commodities
  • Collectables
    • Art
    • Classic Cars
    • Whiskey
    • Wine
  • Trading
  • Alternative Investment
  • Markets
  • More
    • Economy
    • Money
    • Business
    • Personal Finance
    • Investing
    • Financial Planning
    • ETFs
    • Equities
    • Funds
The Asset ObserverThe Asset Observer
Home»Economy
Economy

Trump’s False Tariff “Fairness” Argument

News RoomBy News RoomMarch 15, 2025
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

President Trump’s argument for starting an international trade war is based on a socialistic-sounding plea for “fairness” and equality. Some foreign governments plunder their citizens with high tariff taxes on American imports, thereby forcing them to pay higher prices for those or competing domestic goods. The reason they are called “protective” tariffs is that they “protect” consumers from lower prices. When your foreign competitor is forced to pay a 50 percent tax on his products and you do not, you can increase your price by say, 40 percent and still underprice him. Politically connected corporations pocket this loot at the expense of their hapless, politically unorganized fellow citizens. Tariff taxes are legalized theft for the benefit of already-rich corporations and their unions (if they are unionized). They have never been anything more than yet another vote-buying scheme that empowers the politically powerful and screws the common consumer, clouded by phony rhetoric about patriotism and nationalism.

President Trump’s demand of “fairness” is as follows: Whatever tariff taxes foreign governments place on American imports, an equivalent tariff tax will be imposed on their imports into the U.S. It’s only fair, he says. This is his justification for higher – much higher – tariff taxes on imports into the U.S.

The end result of this will be an even larger degree of legalized theft as American consumers – and American corporations that use imported parts for their own manufactured products (i.e, American auto companies that import auto parts from Canada) are plundered with higher prices paid for the same (or worse quality) products. Political theft by tariff tax has always been a rob-Peter-to-pay Paul racket. How, then, is it “fair” to American consumers, automakers, and myriad other American businesses to be forced to pay higher prices? Of course it is not; it is quintessentially unfair.

There’s a saying in economics that a tax on imports is also a tax on exports. This is because if America’s foreign trading partners are impoverished by protectionist tariffs they will then have fewer dollars with which to purchase American goods in international trade, especially agricultural products. This will obviously harm American exporters and their employees and communities, This is also patently unfair. There is nothing more anti-populist than protectionist tariff taxes. 

President Trump has repeatedly stated with great excitement that with his impending huge tariff tax increases “we,” meaning the federal government, are “going to take in A LOT of money.” Well now. Since when has it been the priority of the Trump administration to drain the pockets of American consumers and businesses with tariff taxes so that the federal bureaucracy can become even more enlarged and bloated than it already is. Isn’t that a flat contradiction of all of President Trump’s campaign promises, not to mention the professed goal of the DOGE?

The president can never resist boasting of his negotiating prowess and he obviously intends to use the threat of tariff taxes as his primary negotiating tool. If he really was a master negotiator who was genuinely interested in justice and fairness, he would propose the following deal to foreign governments: “We will eliminate all tariff taxes on your imports into the United States if you eliminate all tariff taxes on American imports into your country.” Just depriving the federal bureaucracy of all that tariff tax revenue alone makes this a far superior negotiating tactic than his Quixotic call for a 1930s-style international trade war.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Keep Reading

What the UnitedHealth Assassination Revealed About American Elites

‘Quiet Panic’ as National Rental Assistance Program Set to Run Out of Cash

Live music seems recession-proof. Thank the ticket scalpers

The Democrats Are Going Extinct – A New Party Will Rise From The Ashes

My Weekly Reading for March 23, 2025

The Middle East Logistics Wars 

Links 3/22/2025 | naked capitalism

The Fed will update its rate projections Wednesday. What to expect

Tariffs and Inflation – Econlib

Recent Posts
  • Contemporary Istanbul fair director urges Turkish art to remain ‘radical and clever’ in face of political tension – The Art Newspaper
  • ‘There’s no fudging. She deserves to win’: critics react as Turner Prize 2025 opens – The Art Newspaper
  • Thaddaeus Ropac is betting on Milan—will it pay off? – The Art Newspaper
  • Sydney Contemporary art fair sees fourth year of decline in sales – The Art Newspaper
  • Gallery Climate Coalition, Frieze London Partner for ‘10% Of’ Initiative

Subscribe to Newsletter

Get the latest markets and assets news and updates directly to your inbox.

Editors Picks

‘There’s no fudging. She deserves to win’: critics react as Turner Prize 2025 opens – The Art Newspaper

September 27, 2025

Thaddaeus Ropac is betting on Milan—will it pay off? – The Art Newspaper

September 27, 2025

Sydney Contemporary art fair sees fourth year of decline in sales – The Art Newspaper

September 27, 2025

Gallery Climate Coalition, Frieze London Partner for ‘10% Of’ Initiative

September 27, 2025

Frieze to launch climate change fundraising initiative at its London fairs – The Art Newspaper

September 27, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
© 2025 The Asset Observer. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.